LOADING ...

New York Times Corrections, August 5-9

Aug 10, 2019. 15 comments

The Times welcomes complaints about errors that warrant correction.

FRONT PAGE

White House correspondent Maggie Haberman said it was “dangerous” for Rep. Joaquin Castro to tweet out the names of a bunch of Trump-supporting San Antonians. It was not, in fact, dangerous, as campaign finance records and the names and occupations of donors are publicly available via the Federal Elections Commission website. You can learn how to look them up for yourself here .

DUMB QUESTIONS

Congressional reporter Sheryl Gay Stolberg asked her Twitter followers whether or not the National Republican Congressional Committee was being “unfair” in attacking Lucy McBath, a House Democrat whose son was murdered by a racist , for “politicizing” the tragedies in El Paso and Dayton. As Stolberg indicated by deleting the tweet, there is an obvious answer to this question.

BUSINESS

An article on Tuesday about a 1996 law meant to protect young internet companies from liability misidentified the law that protects hate speech. It is the First Amendment, not Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The error was repeated in the headline.

OPINION

Bret Stephens.

TANTRUMS

Deputy editor Jonathan Weisman did a bad tweet implying Justice Democrats were targeting black members of Congress, without disclosing that the challenger to Rep. Joyce Beatty, attorney Morgan Harper, is also black. When the candidate pointed this out, Weisman responded to this in the most petulant way possible . After receiving a flood of criticism, he emailed one of his critics, author and contributing Times opinion writer Roxane Gay, and demanded an apology . He also emailed her assistant demanding an apology, and also emailed her publisher demanding an apology. In these emails, Weisman said that he has “written off Twitter,” which, judging by his past statements , is nowhere even close to true. The New York Times correction desk regrets Weisman’s sweaty attempt to dig himself out of a hole.

C-LEVEL

Following a horrible headline we ran earlier this week , executive editor Dean Baquet did a round of interviews to clean up the mess. In a conversation with Columbia Journalism Review, Baquet correctly identified that the Times is not an “opposition party” to Donald Trump but failed to note that no one actually wants them to be that—just an actual news outlet that reports the facts of the situation regardless of whether or not they make the White House desk’s sources uncomfortable.

Speaking with the Atlantic, Baquet wrongfully compared Trump to “every politician,” such as the governor of Maine, whom Baquet wrongfully identified as a “he.” While it’s true that every politician “obfuscates” and “exaggerates,” Baquet failed to note that essentially everything that comes out of Trump’s mouth is a lie, and worse, those lies are usually aimed at racial, religious, and ethnic groups that Trump does not like. Relatedly, Baquet did a poor job explaining why the Times twists itself into a pretzel not to call Trump a “racist” in news stories. Just say the word. It’s a fact.

15 Comments

Suggested posts

Conservatives Are Flipping Out Because the New York Times Said Slavery Was Important Conservatives Are Flipping Out Because the New York Times Said Slavery Was Important

In the past few days, the New York Times has been rolling out the 1619 Project, a hugely ambitious effort to mark the 400th anniversary of the arrival of the first enslaved Africans to American shores and place slavery at the center of American history. Conservatives—as they are wont to do —have been completely losing their minds about it.The...

New York Times Staff Seems Pretty Fed Up With Dean Baquet's Explanations New York Times Staff Seems Pretty Fed Up With Dean Baquet's Explanations

If The New York Times was a person, I would say that they were going through it. On Tuesday, a top editor in the Washington bureau was demoted after he couldn’t stop posting racist tweets. A print headline on Tuesday about Donald Trump’s statements on a weekend of mass shootings was criticized, as the Times itself described it, “for...

Jonathan (Not Very) Weisman Jonathan (Not Very) Weisman

New York Times deputy Washington editor Jonathan Weisman simply cannot stop stepping in digital dogshit.After his weird, racist Twitter thread last week , and then another weird and bad comment toward a black progressive candidate for Congress yesterday, Weisman has apparently taken a much-needed break from Twitter. That does not mean, however, that Weisman is successfully suppressing the urge...

What Is Jonathan Weisman's Deal What Is Jonathan Weisman's Deal

Jonathan Weisman is the deputy Washington editor of the New York Times. He doesn’t exactly explain why the Times’ political coverage has been ill-equipped for covering the Trump era, but he’s a good example of how their coverage has sucked.Weisman is approximately one week removed from tweeting out a racist thread in response to the factually true assertion that...

These People Have No Idea How Campaign Finance Works These People Have No Idea How Campaign Finance Works

People are absolutely losing their minds because Joaquin Castro, a Democratic congressman from Texas, tweeted the names of 44 people who donated to President Donald Trump who live in San Antonio. To be clear, this information is made publicly available by the government, and Castro did not post the donors’ addresses or do anything to put them in danger.Among...

Dean Baquet Tries to Explain Terrible New York Times Headline : 'It Was Too Small a Space' Dean Baquet Tries to Explain Terrible New York Times Headline : 'It Was Too Small a Space'

Dean Baquet, the executive editor at the New York Times, did not see the front page of Tuesday’s newspaper before it went to press Monday night, according to the Columbia Journalism Review. He apparently missed the creation of a headline that read like a textbook example of state propaganda : “TRUMP URGES UNITY VS. RACISM.” Editors rewrote the headline,...

Just Try to Understand This NYT Editor's Racist, Incoherent Twitter Thread Just Try to Understand This NYT Editor's Racist, Incoherent Twitter Thread

You know that feeling when you wake up after a late night watching the dumbass Democratic debates , defined by the moderators’ absurd commitment to centrist ideology and repeating Republican attacks as if those are good-faith questions about public policy , and an editor from the New York Times has done a thread about how black people from cities...

Throw Away the Box, Hang Your Grid on a Hook, and Embrace the Tom Friedman Future Throw Away the Box, Hang Your Grid on a Hook, and Embrace the Tom Friedman Future

Say what you will about harrumphing corporate-branded golf shirt Thomas Friedman, but you must admit that he boasts not only a hopelessly muddled command of language, but also a farcically inept sense of political analysis. So. I like to check in sometimes on this guy, and what he is writing, in the world’s most influential media outlet. The American...

Moderate Democratic Governors Are Worried About All the Wrong Things Moderate Democratic Governors Are Worried About All the Wrong Things

It is a day that ends in ‘y’, so we have another article about how Democrats are flubbing 2020 by not doing exactly what Hillary Clinton did in 2016, which, as we all know, worked.Today it’s the New York Times, reporting from the Democratic Governors Association retreat in Nantucket. The paper reported that there was “as much anxiety as...

The Failing (To Accurately Describe Racism as Racism) New York Times The Failing (To Accurately Describe Racism as Racism) New York Times

Another indisputably racist comment from Donald Trump, another wishy-washy, bullshit reaction from the New York Times. On Sunday night, after Trump told four members of Congress —all women of color—to “go back and help fix the totally broken and crime-infested places from which they came,” the New York Times published a piece of “news analysis” in which chief White...

Language