Haas F1's Main Sponsor Went to Court Over Its Logo and Then Things Got Weird

Alanis King May 15, 2019. 24 comments

Rich Energy, the mystery sponsor of the Haas Formula One Team that only gets more mysterious with further research, became the subject of a recent copyright claim when British company Whyte Bikes noticed their logos looked oddly similar. In a scathing judgement this month, Rich Energy lost the case.

Rich Energy didn’t simply lose the case, though. The judge wrote a blistering description of how it went down from her point of view, saying she found some of Rich Energy CEO William Storey’s evidence to be “incorrect or misleading,” and that he was “involved in the manufacture of documents during the course of litigation to provide additional support for the Defendants’ case.”

That, of course, is just the tight summary.

Whyte Bikes announced the result of the case Tuesday, linking to a judgement from Judge Melissa Clarke of the Business and Property Courts of England and Wales that concerns the Rich Energy logo on its products, website, advertising and sponsorship of the Haas team. The judge, essentially, concluded that while there was “no direct evidence” that Storey or the logo’s designer, Sean Kelly, saw Whyte Bikes’ logo during the design process, the logo qualifies as copyright infringement.

Storey, when asked for comment by Jalopnik, said Rich Energy intends to appeal the judgement and that the company is “focused on growing the business and this will not impact that one bit.”

“We are disappointed with the judgment as we felt the evidence strongly supported us and I know we designed independently,” Storey wrote via email. “Unfortunately any case like this is about an opinion of a third party.”

The logos are “strikingly similar,” the judge ruled. This goes against what Rich Energy claimed, that its logo is an independent design meant to reflect a modern take on the deer that live in a park in the Richmond, London, England, where Rich Energy derives its name . That is, of course, the Rich Energy that is rebranded under Storey’s name. It’s complicated . A comparison of the two can be seen below:

The result of that conclusion, according to the judgement, is that Whyte Bikes will get a choice between damages and injunctive relief for the infringement—forcing Rich Energy to stop using its current logo, presumably—or “an account of profits at its election.” Jalopnik has reached out to Whyte Bikes to ask what its official choice will be, and will update this story when we hear back.

The judgement, however, said the company sought, among other things, “an injunction which would require the removal of the logo ... from the Formula 1 race car and website of the Rich Energy Haas Formula 1 motor racing team” with the claim. Jalopnik has asked the Haas team for comment, and will, again, update this story if we hear back.

But the copyright judgement is far from the most interesting part of it all—it was Judge Clarke’s description of how the case went.

The judgement said that while Judge Clarke found Whyte Bikes’ two witnesses to be “straightforward, credible and reliable witnesses” who assisted the court “to the best of their abilities,” she found Storey and Kelly to be “poor witnesses” and had concerns about their credibility—citing that she found there to be conflicting and inconsistent evidence from the defense, as well as what she determined to be “manufactured documentation.”

That manufactured document was created in 2018, according to the judgement, which was presented as a document “compiling together previously existing documents, created by or in the possession of [Staxoweb Limited, Kelly’s digital agency] before the time the Brand Document was put together.”

But here’s what Judge Clarke found via the judgement, emphasis ours:

In fact, Mr Kelly’s oral evidence at trial was that the Brand Document was no such thing. In cross-examination, he said that apart from the pencil drawings High Court Approved Judgment: ATB Sales Limited v Rich Energy Limited and Ors on pages 6-18 which dated from June 2015, and all of the renderings on pages 19-22 which dated from on or around 2 July 2015, the rest of the Brand Document was:

produced… to try and aid the court to see, to put together the pieces, because the only originals we had were the original sketches and the black geometric designs, and obviously the can design, but those are the only originals. So just to aid, you know, our recollection of those events, we decided to put together a comparison document, which kind of pieces it together, so that we could talk about it more easily”.

The brand document, the judge wrote, “significantly undermined” her view of Kelly and Storey’s credibility.

Judge Clarke also said the defendants’ evidence of independent design was, at best, “confused and contradictory and purports to be supported by documents which are not what they seem,” and that they showed an “unreasonable unwillingness ... to even countenance the possibility that they might have seen, but forgotten” the Whyte Bikes logo.

Here’s an excerpt from the judgement, emphasis ours, with “C” relating to the Whyte Bikes logo and “D1” referring to the one for Rich Energy:

In my judgment, there are two possibilities. The first is that Mr Kelly and Mr Storey are lying: they were familiar with C’s Device, and deliberately copied it to produce D1’s Device, making minor changes either to meet Mr Storey’s aesthetic preferences or to ensure the copy was not a facsimile of C’s Device. The second is that Mr Kelly and Mr Storey are telling the truth: they do not remember seeing C’s Device and have no familiarity with it, and did not copy it either knowingly or subconsciously, but created the misleading Brand Research document, the fake vector lines on the render and gave misleading evidence in order to support an evidentially weak, but otherwise truthful case of independent creation. [...]

The fact that, as I have found, it was Mr Storey who was doing the bulk of the internet searching, and sharing “hundreds” of logos with Mr Kelly, I consider is significant, particularly in light of the Brand Document produced several years later which still sought to represent as a ‘possible starting point’ the logos of other companies. I infer from that that Mr Storey was looking for inspiration from existing logos, rather than relying on Mr Kelly to do his job and create a wholly original logo from scratch. In my judgment, it is more likely than not that Mr Storey and Mr Kelly did access C’s Device during the course of this research.

Judge Clarke also wrote of what she believed to be Storey’s “apparently natural tendency to exaggerate” and avoidance of some questions, emphasis ours:

Mr Storey provided different and inconsistent accounts of the development of D1’s Device, which also conflicted to a large extent with the evidence of Mr Kelly. He often did not answer questions directly, preferring to make speeches about his vision for his business or alternatively seeking to evade questions by speaking in generalities or in the third person plural. He only answered several questions when I intervened. He had a tendency to make impressive statements, which on further investigation or consideration were not quite what they seemed.

The judgement, on that note, mentioned a press quote from Storey in February that said Rich Energy had produced 90 million cans. When asked about the quote, the judgement said Storey explained it as such:

Mr Storey explained that it had produced 90 million cans, but had not yet filled and sold them. He said he would have to check the figures, but in 2018 he thought the First Defendant had filled and sold “circa 3 million cans” of Rich Energy drink.

Comparatively, Storey told Jalopnik earlier this year that Rich Energy had sold “in excess of 100 million cans” and that the number was “growing rapidly by the day.”

Judge Clarke, in the end, ruled that the logos are so similar that Rich Energy’s was “more likely to be the result of copying than coincidence,” but the conclusion is mild compared to the rest of her accounts of how this all went down—all of which can be read, in full, here.

Update: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 at 8:12 a.m. ET: A spokesperson for Whyte Bikes responded to Jalopnik, saying that the company will seek, in addition to damages, an injunction for “the removal of the infringing copy of our logo from all Rich Energy’s branding, including but not limited to the Haas F1 cars.”

The Haas team declined to comment on the situation, but Rich Energy released an official statement on Tuesday that reiterated what Storey told Jalopnik, in addition to saying the following:

The now well-known branding of Rich Energy has been under scrutiny since the brand launched itself as a title sponsor within the global platform of Formula One. With over a billion people now watching the Rich Energy brand, the potential requirement to change its logo will not change the company’s future programs.

Whilst the initial judgement is disappointing, and only applies to the United Kingdom, Rich Energy will now focus on its strong sales growth and commitment to delivering its premium product to current and new markets.

Update: Thursday, May 16, 2019 at 7:37 p.m. ET: Rich Energy tweeted on Thursday that it’s “looking forward” to meeting Whyte Bikes in court again on June 27, and that the “truth will emerge.” The two tweets were accompanied by hashtags like “#KO,” “#justice,” “#victory,” “#sport” and “#competition.”

This story has been corrected to say that Richmond is an area within London.

Thanks for the email, Sean!


Other Alanis King's posts

GM Recalls More Than 550,000 Trucks Over Potential For Seat-Belt Systems To Cause Fires GM Recalls More Than 550,000 Trucks Over Potential For Seat-Belt Systems To Cause Fires

Most recalls through the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration are for problems that aren’t great but sound rather normal, like rollaway risk , airbag issues , or faulty builds . But a new, nearly 560,000-truck General Motors recall sounds like something out of a Mad Lib: Seat belts in the affected vehicles could, in the right conditions, end...

How Would You Configure Your Aston Martin DBX? How Would You Configure Your Aston Martin DBX?

In all honesty, an Aston Martin SUV isn’t the worst thing. I mean, my growing family of cats was really struggling to fit in the two-seaters, and we needed to add a larger vehicle to the family in order to all fit. Fluffy and Mittens also kept thinking the clutch pedal in the Vantage AMR was some form of...

Matt Crafton Played NASCAR's Game And Won Matt Crafton Played NASCAR's Game And Won

Leading up to the NASCAR Truck Series’ championship race on Friday, where a title would be decided by the highest finisher of four drivers still in contention in that single race, the long shot this season, Matt Crafton, was asked about the potential for him to become the first winless champion in this era of NASCAR. Crafton, in fact,...

Seven-Time NASCAR Cup Series Champion Jimmie Johnson Will Retire After The 2020 Season Seven-Time NASCAR Cup Series Champion Jimmie Johnson Will Retire After The 2020 Season

Just months after failing to qualify for the NASCAR Cup Series playoffs for the first time in his career and days after the end of the 2019 season , seven-time Cup Series champion Jimmie Johnson announced on Wednesday that next year will be his last as a full-time Cup Series driver.Even without another title in 2020, Johnson will retire...

Suggested posts

Comment Of The Day: 26th Century Racing Edition Comment Of The Day: 26th Century Racing Edition

Comment Of The Day Your good comments.Prev NextView All Rumor has it that the Formula One bosses are looking for new ways to make Formula One more interesting. They’ve given up on sprinkler systems and joker laps. Those are the old way of thinking. They’re thinking bigger. Space. You might think that Red Bull’s pit stop in zero-gravity was...

Watch The First-Ever Formula One Pit Stop In Zero Gravity Watch The First-Ever Formula One Pit Stop In Zero Gravity

Have you ever wondered what it would be like for a Formula One pit crew to take on a tire change in space? I know that I have, mostly just because I frequently wonder what it would the future of racing will be (hint: it is long-distance interplanetary racing). Red Bull Racing is ahead of the game—it’s already practicing...

What Should Be The Next Big Racing Movie? What Should Be The Next Big Racing Movie?

Countersteer Your true stories of good and bad things that happen in cars.Prev NextView All In the past few years, we’ve had both Rush and Ford V. Ferrari, two very great historically-based movies about motorsport that, for all their minor flaws, still kick so much ass that it’s hard not to wax a little poetic about them. But what other...

Red Bull Beats Its Own Record For Fastest Pit Stop For The Third Time This Season Red Bull Beats Its Own Record For Fastest Pit Stop For The Third Time This Season

World records, like rules or the latches on public restroom doors, were made to be broken. Again . And again . Red Bull Racing truly lives by this motto. They’ve just beat their own record of 1.88 seconds with a 1.82-second long pit stop. That’s four tires off and four tires on in less time than it takes to...

Watch Carlos Sainz Jr.'s Magical Drive From 20th To A Podium At The Brazilian Grand Prix Watch Carlos Sainz Jr.'s Magical Drive From 20th To A Podium At The Brazilian Grand Prix

Every so often, race fans are gifted with a magical, beautiful moment that cuts through the rest of Formula One’s very frequent bullshit. We had one of those moments this past weekend at the Brazilian Grand Prix, when McLaren’s Carlos Sainz Jr. drove from 20th place to a third-place podium position. Now you can watch the best parts of...

Sebastian Vettel Has Choice Words For Teammate As Both Ferraris Wreck At Brazil Sebastian Vettel Has Choice Words For Teammate As Both Ferraris Wreck At Brazil

Ferrari’s day was cut short at the Brazilian Grand Prix when Sebastian Vettel collided with teammate Charles Leclerc after getting passed by him on the straight. Each car suffered damage that ended the race for both drivers with only a handful of laps to go. Vettel can be heard on the radio yelling “Puncture! What the hell is he...

Max Verstappen Brings Honda Its First Pole In Brazil Since Ayrton Senna Max Verstappen Brings Honda Its First Pole In Brazil Since Ayrton Senna

Max Verstappen, for all the excitement he brings into any given Formula One race, has only started a race on pole once in his career. Today, after being dominant in every session, he extends that list to two. And the pole is the first for a Honda-powered car at Interlagos since 1991 when Ayrton Senna qualified first for McLaren.Verstappen...

If Money Can't Buy Happiness How Does This $20,000 Slot Car Track Exist? If Money Can't Buy Happiness How Does This $20,000 Slot Car Track Exist?

I often wish I were obscenely, disgustingly, filthy rich solely for the sheer amount of dumb stuff I could buy that would bring me an infinite amount of infantile joy. And one of those things is the slot car version of Abu Dhabi’s Grand Prix circuit, replete with wonderful little Formula One slot cars.I’ve never been so in love...

Literally Everything Is Wrong With Ferrari's Formula One Team Literally Everything Is Wrong With Ferrari's Formula One Team

Another year, another disappointing Formula One season for Ferrari, who can’t quite seem to get its shit together long enough to actually mount a significant challenge for the championship. And, according to team boss Mattia Binotto, that’s because literally every possible thing has gone wrong! Everything!Binotto sounds appropriately flustered about the whole situation. Engine reliability has impacted Ferrari’s races...

Formula One Plans To Go Carbon Neutral Formula One Plans To Go Carbon Neutral

While the world becomes more environmentally conscious, motorsport overall has been susceptible to criticism for what is arguably a pretty extravagant use of resources. As a result, Formula One has released a sustainability plan that aims to have the series have a net-zero carbon footprint by 2030, with all events being sustainable by 2025.The plan is the result of...